paritybit.ca

Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
Log | Files | Refs | README | LICENSE

commit 136f831f8b10fe0f3ff057008c2e0e2993ebde3d
parent 920e277f06582c298d5aaa78cca85694d4bf99fb
Author: Jake Bauer <jbauer@paritybit.ca>
Date:   Mon,  8 Nov 2021 03:42:38 -0500

Draft of latest blog post

Diffstat:
Mpages/blog/free-software-is-an-abject-failure.md | 13+++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pages/blog/free-software-is-an-abject-failure.md b/pages/blog/free-software-is-an-abject-failure.md @@ -74,12 +74,13 @@ least one other owner. If Stallman can dictate how others can use his software—even if it is more freely than most proprietary software—then it clearly has an owner. -Simply put, Stallman uses the exact structures which he criticized as -justification for his actions. He uses these existing systems in what he clearly -deems is the "right" way and yet criticizes the way others use it as wrong. GNU, -the GPL, and seemingly the entirety of Free Software as it stands today are all -based on the same premises on which Stallman says proprietary software is also -based and which he rejected in _Why Software Should Be Free_. +Simply put, Stallman, and others in the Free Software community use the exact +same excuses criticized in _Why Software Should Be Free_ as justification for +their actions. These systems are used in what is deemed the "right" way while +the movement criticizes the way others use them as wrong. GNU, the GPL, and +seemingly the entirety of Free Software as it stands today are all based on the +same premises on which Stallman says proprietary software is also based and +which he rejected in _Why Software Should Be Free_. To be frank, the Free Software movement comes off as both a "cult of personality"—worshipping Richard Stallman and his teachings, as well as a "cult